A freedom greater than freedom Essay - 2455 Words

It is a common misconception that those in power necessarily have more liberty than their less powerful counterparts. Intuitively, a country’s king has the freedom to act in more ways than the peasant, the rich have more options than the poor, the slave owner rules while the slave is ruled, and a government official often treads above the laws they pen for the people. However, there is a hidden assumption in this way of thought— that liberty is proportional to quality of life. From a pragmatic point of view, most would choose the life of the king over the life of the slave, the rich over the poor, the slave owners over the slaves, or the above the law status to the law abiding one, simply because the quality of life of one is so much†¦show more content†¦We begin with Hawthorne’s Puritan soap opera and one of its principal characters, certainly one of the most pitiful men in American literature, Mr. Arthur Dimmesdale (this is not to suggest that he is cr uel, sinful or wicked, merely that one can at most feel pity for the way he supports a way of life that crushes him). Within the limits of Boston in the mid-1640’s Dimmesdale, being a minister, is quite revered. His faith is envied, his audiences awestruck and his role as a leader in the community assured. If we define power to be influence over another, then Dimmesdale holds great power in both his words and actions. However, compared with others in his community, did he have more freedom? I mean by asking the question concluding the preceding paragraph to raise another question. Are freedoms only what one is allowed to do in the public arena? Or the private arena? Or in both? Certainly, our ability to speak out against a public official is one of many easily identifiable freedoms, but there are other freedoms that go mostly undetected. For example, it is by convention that one does not swear during a formal speech to an audience. Not only do almost all public speakers abid e by this convention, but most would not even think about breaking it. They are choosing not to swear, undoubtedly, but choosing to swear isShow MoreRelated The Ontological Argument Essay1446 Words   |  6 Pages The Ontological Argument nbsp; The Ontological Argument, put forth by Saint Anselm in his Proslogium, attempts to prove the existence of God simply by the fact that we have a particular concept of God - that God is that than which nothing greater can be conceived. Saint Anselm presents a convincing argument that many people view as the work of a genius. It is also quite often considered a failure because, in William L. Rowes words, In granting that Anselms God is a possible thing weRead MoreThe Awakening By Kate Chopin And The House On Mango Street1732 Words   |  7 PagesFreedom. A goal. A liberty. A myth. So many descriptions for a single concept. Yet the main idea is the same: to be free of restrictions, free to be whatever you wish. It is a life necessity, one that was, unfortunately, and still is, restricted throughout history, resulting in many chasing after its acquisition. Humans currently live in a time, in several nations, where freedom is a right, a necessity of life freely given. However, throughout history, freedom has been kept to only a minority, resultingRead MorePolitical Freedom: Arendt and de Tocqueville Essay1461 Words   |  6 PagesPolitical Freedom: Arendt and de Tocqueville Freedom in America emanates from the state of political freedom held by the citizens. Both Hannah Arendt and Alexis de Tocqueville provide criticism of the apparent shape freedom maintains in America as well as insight regarding how they perceive true political freedom. By using the observations and criticisms of de Tocqueville and the vision of Arendt, the position of modern America and its relation toRead MoreThe Expulsion of Freedom 1408 Words   |  6 Pagesbestowed with the blessings of freedom during their individual genesis on this fruitful planet, but this natural freedom is immensely circumscribed as it’s exchanged for the civil liberties of the State. He indicated that the supplanting of natural freedom is necessary for the obtainment of greater power for the greater collective community, but the prospect of obtaining superlative capabilities comes with the price of constraints. Yet this notion of natural freedom conflicts with Thomas Hobbes renditionRead MoreNel son Mandela Speeches779 Words   |  4 PagesHave you ever looked up at someone because of their accomplishments? What about Nelson Mandela? He fought for freedom of people with different types of colored skin. Same with Harriet Tubman and how she risked her life for freedom. What about Malala Yousafzai and her amazing journey on schooling for girls all over the world? These people are amazing, but what did they do that was so incredible? Nelson Mandela was amazing because of his speeches and how he risked his life, and was inspiring to allRead MoreEconomic Freedom Wealth Essay1510 Words   |  7 PagesEconomic Freedom and Wealth Economic freedom is the ability for an individual to prosper with minimal intervention from government. In an economically free society, individuals are empowered to succeed or fail based on their own individual abilities. Higher levels of economic freedom lead to higher levels of economic growth and income. The level of economic freedom varies among different regions and countries across the globe. Thus, levels of prosperity and wealth also vary widely across the globeRead MoreBoth Mill And Nietzsche Would Argue That The Singularity1342 Words   |  6 PagesBoth Mill and Nietzsche would argue that the singularity of values, or preconceived, undivided ideas of truth, is an impediment to freedom. Nietzsche’s perspective further details how utility theory, as a method to determine freedom, inhibits freedom, as it appears to support the singularity of values. He would argue that prescribing a moral good of utility and saying that it is good for society as a whole, is promoting cultural specificity in that it assumes that one idea is good for everyone. NietzscheRead MoreThe Power and the Glory- Character Analysis in Terms of Freedom1114 Words   |  5 PagesThe lieutenant: The lieutenant is the priests main pursuer, charged and inspired to hunt him down no matter the means. He feels it is his responsibility to rid the state of religion in the belief that the people will have greater freedom in a secular world. On page 51, the lieutenant is resting on his bed deep in thought; â€Å"A complete certainty in the existence of a dying, cooling world of human beings who had evolved from animals for no purpose at all. He knew† The metaphor â€Å"dying, cooling world†Read MoreIt. Has Been Said That â€Å"The Engendering Impulse Of African1547 Words   |  7 PagesAmerica but in a broader outlook, having a different skin color other than white in America. There are specific works in African American literature history that exemplified African American resistance to human tyranny, specifically the need to freedom. African Americans focused most of their energy attempting to abolish the mistreatment and oppression they faced and a prime example that showed the need for freedom was the old negro folktale from the eighteenth century titled All GodsRead MoreFreedom in of Mice and Men821 Words   |  4 PagesTheme: Freedom In Of Mice and Men, freedom is not necessarily a central point of the novel. It is a subtle theme which is constantly being mentioned or related to. You have to read between the lines in order to understand how the characters speech links to the theme. George and Lennie: Candy: Candy is immediately drawn in by the dream in Section three of the book when he overheard George and Lennie talking about it. This is probably because the thought of freedom barely every came into his

Corporate Social Responsibility ( Csr ) - 1173 Words

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is highly important to Millennials. If a company is lacking a CSR plan, now it a good time to start one. Millennials are looking for ways in making a positive impact on the world and are expecting the same from companies. They are looking for companies that contribute to the betterment of communities and the environment. Millennials put great value in supporting such brands, companies and organizations that share these values. Companies without a CSR in place are potentially losing out on the millennial investor, consumer, and employee. It’s no secret millennials are of a different mindset than other demographics. Millennials hold different values from other groups such as the baby boomers. In†¦show more content†¦Ã¢â€"  1 in 3 tend to praise organization/groups that are involved in social causes. ââ€"  4 in 5 are more likely to purchase from a company that support a cause that they care about. ââ€"  3 in 4 strongly believe corporations should create economic value for society by addressing its needs. Millennials are looking for companies that are more likely to support areas of social and environmental efforts that they are interested and passionate about. In a study, 2015 Cone Communications Millennial CSR reveals: †¢ 87% of millennials will purchase products with a social or environmental benefit as opposed to the US average of 83%. †¢ 82% of millennials would tell friends and family of CSR efforts, 10% more than the US average. Studies show an overwhelming percentage of millennials far more likely to support a company that share its values and beliefs over the average person in the U.S. Companies that have an active and well thought out CSR that align with millennial expectation can result in more profitability, better word of mouth and potentially have a consumer for life. To be successful in today s market and maintain a competitive advantage, businesses must have a CSR implemented to attract and succeed in the millennial sector. An article titled â€Å"Corporate social responsibility is millennials new religion† reinforces the positive perception of CSR and are willing to support it as well as give negative feedback on those who don’t.

The history of Christmas free essay sample

The History Of Christmas Christmas Time The tradition of winter festivals is a long-standing 1. Many civilizations believed that the cold and dark of winter was a clip when their Supreme beings were in conflict with enemies, and they would keep jubilations in order to assist their divinities win. Scandinavia, where the construct of a # 8216 ; Yuletide # 8217 ; originally evolved, would see a period of several yearss where the Sun did non demo at all in the deepness of winter, and would keep a festival in order to announce its reappearance. The winter solstice was besides the most practical clip for banquets to be held: cowss which could non be fed through the winter were slaughtered in the late fall, and as a consequence the winter would be the one clip when European provincials were most likely to hold a stock of fresh meat, which needed to be either salted, or eaten. Equally the beer which had been brewed in the fall would be merely ready to imbibe by the clip that the winter festivals came about. It is hence no surprise that by the clip of Christianity there was already an constituted history of festivals which were held in late December. One of the most noteworthy jubilations was the Roman Saturnalia # 8211 ; a hedonic festival where friends would be visited and nowadayss exchanged. However, the 25th of December was besides sacred to the Persian faith of Mithraism, as the birthday of their God.The early Christian Church did non observe the birth of Christ, preferring to concentrate on his decease and Resurrection at Easter. Christmas may hold been celebrated from every bit early as 98AD, but it was merely in 350AD that Pope Julius I declared Christmas to be the 25th of December. The day of the month of Christ # 8217 ; s birth is non really mentioned in the Bible, and the presence of shepherds croping their sheep on the hillsides has led many scriptural bookmans to propose that Christ must hold been born during the spring. However, the pick of the 25th of December has infl uenced the development of the Christmas festival irreversibly. Many of the traditions associated with winter solstice festivals seamlessly became portion of the Western tradition of Christmas clip. Over the centuries many have tried to return to a more grave jubilation of Christ # 8217 ; s birth: Oliver Cromwell cancelled Christmas after the events of the English Civil War, disgusted by the behavior of common people on what was supposed to be a spiritual festival. The Puritans in Boston even declared Christmas illegal for a period in the seventeenth century, and at that place was a all right for anyone who celebrated the juncture. Although Christmas would non go a federal vacation until 1870 in the US, the traditions environing Christmas developed and grew during the 19th and 20th centuries, to go the Christmas that we, and the shopping Centres of the universe, celebrate today. Christmas Furnishings Many of the established Christmas clip traditions have small or nil to make with the scriptural history of Christ # 8217 ; s birth. Some existed for 100s, or 1000s of old ages before Christianity, whilst others have evolved, apparently out of nil, over the past few centuries.Evergreen trees and workss were frequently used in the spiritual festivals of the past. During the winter, when everything else was deceasing, the go oning green of fir-trees and mistletoe was considered to symbolize the metempsychosis that would come in the spring. As a consequence evergreen leaf was used in winter festivals by the Vikings, whilst Druids in Britain and France would adorn trees with fruit and tapers in honor of their harvest Gods. The Roman Saturnalia besides used to adorn their houses with trees bedecked with tapers and other bright bangles. Harmonizing to legend, Martin Luther decorated trees with tapers to reflect the beauty of the stars. In England, the tradition was resurrected by Prince Al bert in 1841. The royal household led the manner and Christmas trees became an established portion of the gay season.Holly and Mistletoe have besides become a cardinal portion of Christmas. Mistletoe was frequently used by Druids. It was believed to hold mystical powers, and it was frequently hung over doors in order to maintain out evil influences. The tradition of snoging under the mistletoe may hold come from Scandinavia, where mistletoe was associated with the goddess of love, Frigga. Because of its heathen associations, the Christian Church objected to mistletoe being used for Christmas jubilations. As a replacement they suggested holly, another evergreen, claiming that the crisp foliages represented Christ # 8217 ; s Crown of irritants, and the ruddy berries symbolised beads of his blood. Both workss have become a portion of the seasonal festivities.The 12 yearss of Christmas do seemingly hold a Christian beginning: they are the 12 yearss between Christmas twenty-four hours a nd the banquet of the Epiphany ( which harmonizing to different readings is either the twenty-four hours of Christ # 8217 ; s baptism or the visit of the wise work forces ) . It is considered bad fortune if all of the Christmas ornaments have non been taken down by the terminal of the 12th twenty-four hours # 8211 ; the 6th of January.Christmas cards emerged in Germany in the 15th century. Rather than being greetings cards, they were devotional images to be hung in the place, wishing the household a good and blest twelvemonth. In the 18th century the tradition began to turn, when seasonally decorated cards were used as visiting cards left for absent friends. However, Christmas cards would make their extremum with the coming of the British mailing system in the mid-nineteenth century. Now that letters could be sent around the state at high velocity and for low costs, Christmas cards became popular as a inexpensive manner to direct Christmas wants to friends and relatives that you w ould non see over the gay season.They were peculiarly popular as a card, sent in an uncertain envelope cost merely half a penny, half the monetary value of a full letter.Father Christmas’ narrative is good known. The original theoretical account for Santa, was Saint Nicholas, the bishop of Myra. Harmonizing to fable, he brought a dowery for three misss, who were excessively hapless to happen hubbies. Whilst they were kiping he put the gift in their stockings, which were hanging by the fire to dry. The cult of Saint Nicholas spread across much of Europe, and St Nicholas’ Day, December 6th, was a twenty-four hours for giving and kindness when parents would offer nowadayss to their kids. The thought of St Nicholas spread to America with the Dutch settlers, and it was the American imperativeness which transformed Father Christmas into his current image. Clement Moore’s poem ‘The Night Before Christmas’ , published in 1822, introduced the universe to Father Christmas’ winging caribou, and the manner that he dist ributed nowadayss down chimney tonss. We discovered what Santa Claus looks like, when a magazine called Harpers Weekly published a series of images by the cartoonist Thomas Nash. His ruddy suit with white fixingss came, coincidently, from St Nicholas, whose bishop’s robes would hold been ruddy and white. Boxing Day There are presently two chief theories about where the tradition and name of # 8216 ; Boxing Day # 8217 ; came from. Some claim that most retainers had to work on Christmas Day itself, so that they would merely be able to go forth the house and see their households on the undermentioned twenty-four hours, the 26th of December. This was when the maestro or kept woman of the house would give the employees their Christmas boxes. Over clip the tradition has expanded, so that now boxes or gifts are given to anybody who has provided a service over the old twelvemonth: from milkmen to cleaners.The 2nd theory is that Boxing Day is really linked to the Feast of St Stephen on the 26th of December. One of the seven original deacons of the church, St Stephen was ordained to supply alms and attention for widows and the hapless. St Stephen # 8217 ; s Day was the clip when the church alms boxes were opened up and the money interior was distributed to mendicants and the needy.Boxing Day has likel y existed in Britain since the Middle Ages, but it became a public bank vacation in 1871, officially falling on the first weekday after Christmas. New Year The construct of observing the morning of the New Year goes back a really long manner so. The ancient Babylonians are believed to hold celebrated the New Year more than 4000 old ages ago. They even had the modern tradition of doing declarations to symbolize a fresh start. However, the Babylonians celebrated the New Year at the first new Moon after the start of spring, fiting the metempsychosis in nature and the start of a new twelvemonth in agribusiness. The Romans excessively began by observing the New Year at some clip in late March. However, the Roman calendar had some troubles in fiting the motions of the Sun, and although the New Year was celebrated in March, this did non needfully intend that it was being celebrated in the springtime. Finally in 153 BC the Senate declared that the start of the New Year was to come on January 1st. It is believed that the month of January may be named after Janus, a ambidextrous Roman God, who symbolised alteration and metempsychosis. His two fac es looked back into the old twelvemonth, and frontward into the new. The Roman calendar, nevertheless, would non eventually settle until the Julian system was introduced in 46BC. Although Julius kept the 1st of January as the start of the New Year, 47BC had been a 445 twenty-four hours twelvemonth, in order to acquire the calendar back in line with the seasons. As a consequence the New Year jubilations that the Romans handed down to us were in the center of winter. It should be noted that the early Christian Church disapproved of New Year festivities every bit late as the Middle Ages, sing them to be a heathen ritual.The New Year has ever been much more of import in Scotland than England. During the early portion of this century, many Scots would work through Christmas, salvaging their jubilations until January and the Hogmanay celebrations. The term # 8216 ; Hogmanay # 8217 ; may hold come from an Anglo Saxon term for # 8216 ; holy month # 8217 ; , or a Celtic phrase significan ce # 8216 ; new forenoon # 8217 ; . Traditionally canons fire and bells sound to tag the New Year and so people venture out of their houses for the tradition of # 8216 ; First Footing # 8217 ; . It has frequently been believed in the yesteryear that whatever happens in the first hours of a New Year will impact the family # 8217 ; s fortune for the following 12 months. Harmonizing to the rite of # 8216 ; First Footing # 8217 ; , good fortune will come if the first individual to traverse the threshold after the sounding of the New Year is a tall dark adult male transporting gifts of whiskey, coal and nutrient. The significance of the gifts is reasonably self-explanatory, intending that you will hold them in copiousness over the undermentioned twelvemonth. The importance of person tall and dark is more hard to explicate, although it has been suggested that this dates from the yearss of Viking invasions, when the presence of a blond adult male on your doorsill was barely a mark o f luck.The other great tradition of New Year # 8217 ; s Eve is besides Scots in beginning. # 8216 ; Auld Lang Syne # 8217 ; intending # 8216 ; old long ago # 8217 ; was written, at least in portion, by Robert Burns, and was published after his decease in 1796. Now sung around the universe, the vocal has two poetries, and the words are as below: Should old familiarity be forgot, and neer called to mind.Should old familiarity be forgot and yearss of Auld Lang Syne.For auld lang syne, my beloved. For auld lang syne.We # 8217 ; ll take a cup of kindness yet for the yearss of auld lang syne.Should old familiarity be forgot and neer called to mind.Should old familiarity be forgot and yearss of auld lang syne.And here # 8217 ; s a manus, my trustworthy friend. And gie # 8217 ; s a manus O # 8217 ; thine.We # 8217 ; ll take a cup of kindness yet for the yearss of auld lang syne.

Portrayal of colonisers and the colonised in Joseph Conrads Heart of Darkness Essay Example For Students

Portrayal of colonisers and the colonised in Joseph Conrads Heart of Darkness Essay Joseph Conrads novella Heart of Darkness was published 1902, after first being a three-part series in magazines. This book is one of the most influential books in world literature, it has made a huge impact on other authors and some of them have even written a whole book about this book. For example the Swedish author Olof Lagercrantz has written a whole book Fà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½rd med Mà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½rkrets Hjà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½rta (eng: Walk with Heart of Darkness), where he analyses Conrads work. The book has also been made in to a movie (Heart of Darkness), and inspired a making of another film, Apocalypse Now. The book is about colonisation and can be refer to any colonisation at any time. During the entire book Marlowe, the main character, is retelling the story. In short, the book is about how far the human can go for money and power and also how easily a human being can forget what is right and what is wrong when he is put in unfamiliar environment. In the beginning of the book a story is being told about a Danish man who got killed by the natives after he had attacked them. The reason was because of a misunderstanding about some hence. The Danish man is, or rather was, described as the gentlest, quietest creature that ever walked on two legs. This statement makes it even more clear how much the coloniser was marked by being in a colony and how many of them went from being absolutely normal to become crazy. Another example of this can be exemplified by the doctor who examines Marlowe when he is going out to work in the colony. He says that most of the men he examines never return, that they disappears out there. He even asks Marlowe if he has any madness in his family. There you can see the doctors point of the whole colonisation that you have to be insane to go out there. Before Marlowe leaves, the doctor tells Marlowe Du calme, du calme. Adieu. Here the doctor is warning Marlowe about the dangerous life out there and if he is going to have any chance of survival he better keep calm. Another interesting thing to notice is the natives reactions when they had killed the Danish man. Even though the natives killed him in self-defence they felt so bad about their action that the whole population escaped. They were also so frightened over their action. They could not stand to live there after what they had done.. Something to have in mind here is did they coloniser feel the same after killing one man? Well obviously not, because otherwise they would not keep doing it. Already here, in the beginning of the book you feel that there is a huge gulf between the coloniser and the colonised. At one point Marlowe describes the colonised as lively people, they shouted and sang and they wanted no excuse for being there. Because it was their country, of course you dont need an excuse for being in your own country. It were their country that they had grown up in and then suddenly some white people came and took all their rights away from them. The colonisers treated them like animals, described them as dusty niggers, enemies and criminals. The following two quotes point at a very distinct different between the two groups. The black man is being described as I could see every rib, the joints of their limbs were like knots in a rope; each had an iron collar on his neck, and all were connected together with a chain whose bights swung between them, rhythmically clinking. Meanwhile the white man is being described like this I took him for a sort of vision. I saw a high starched collar, white cuffs, I light alpaca jacket, snowy trousers, a clear necktie, and varnished boots. No hat. Hair parted, brushed, oiled, under a green-lined parasol held in a big white hand. He was amazing, and had a penholder behind his ear. There is a big difference in the description of the two men, the white man is being portrayed as amazing. While the black man is being portrayed as far away from amazing as possible. He his being described as if he has done something terrible and that he is pretty much worthless. Marlowe also describes the colonised man as if he could see every rib in his body, compared to the white man as which he describes as having a big white hand. My point is that Marlowe didnt have to mention that his hand was big, he could have said parasol held in a white hand. But I think big has a purpose in this context, that he really wants to mark the big difference between the colonised and the coloniser. Not just that the white people had more powe r, but also that they look so different and that they lived a wealthy life in the colony with good food and drinks. Meanwhile the colonised, whose ribs you could even see, almost were starving to death. .udb22380247871badaa517374f4757d15 , .udb22380247871badaa517374f4757d15 .postImageUrl , .udb22380247871badaa517374f4757d15 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .udb22380247871badaa517374f4757d15 , .udb22380247871badaa517374f4757d15:hover , .udb22380247871badaa517374f4757d15:visited , .udb22380247871badaa517374f4757d15:active { border:0!important; } .udb22380247871badaa517374f4757d15 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .udb22380247871badaa517374f4757d15 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .udb22380247871badaa517374f4757d15:active , .udb22380247871badaa517374f4757d15:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .udb22380247871badaa517374f4757d15 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .udb22380247871badaa517374f4757d15 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .udb22380247871badaa517374f4757d15 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .udb22380247871badaa517374f4757d15 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .udb22380247871badaa517374f4757d15:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .udb22380247871badaa517374f4757d15 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .udb22380247871badaa517374f4757d15 .udb22380247871badaa517374f4757d15-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .udb22380247871badaa517374f4757d15:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Against Interpretation By Susan Sontag EssayOne strong scene in the book is when the coloniser blamed a black man for starting a fire, as punishment they beat him so hard that he almost died and then they left him alone in a corner. Later the white man discussed the incident with Marlowe and the white man says Serve him rightThats the only way. This will prevent all conflagrations for the future According to the white man this was the only right thing to do. They didnt try to find out what happen and who or what started the fire, and they didnt even considered to solve it without violence. This scene says pretty much everything about the colonisers ruthlessness against the colonised. At the same time Marlow later on makes a point about the colonised not being enemies, he shows sympathy towards black people. As if he knows that everything that goes on there are wrong, but he and nobody else dares to say something about it. They are afraid to stand out, maybe they will loose their jobs if they would, which means that they dont have the money to bring home to their family. But the more we read the book it gets clearer and clearer that the white people only are there for the money. For example Mr Kurtz is being described as a great person. Why? Because he sends in as much ivory as all the other. The more money you get and the crueller you are, the greater you are. I have also noticed that in the part when a man asks Marlowe to tell Mr Kurtz everything here is very satisfactory. he finishes with that he doesnt like to send messages because you never know who will get hold of your letter. The point here is that they didnt trust anyone else but themselves. They didnt ev en trust their own people. Almost like the white see the whole colonisation as one big competition and they dont want to share their success with others. An interesting change in the book is when Marlowe, after a twenty-mile walk, finally meat the manager at the station. Now Marlowe is the one who is being treated like he was less worthy. The manager is being extremely nonchalant and cold to him. After a walk of twenty mile the least you expect is to being offered to sit down, which the man didnt do to Marlowe. Marlowe also talks about the manager as if he had neither learning nor intelligence. Which makes you wonder why is he there? How did he come there without learning or intelligence? According to my reflection he came to the colony because he is ice cold. A quote that really proves his heartlessness is this one Men who come out here should have no entrails. I interpret this as the colonisers dont really care about who comes and work for them in the colony, as long as he is willing to do all the missions he is given. While the story is told Marlow is sailing on the Thames, which is located in a part of London that once were colonised by the Romans. Thames is the only real place that we know for sure is being described in the book. But we do know that the story Marlow is telling is about an unnamed European colony in Africa. Marlowe describes the Thames as is has been one of the darkest places on the earth. In the book we also being located somewhere that really sounds as the Congo River in Africa. Then we can relate Thames as the Congo River, but we can also make parallels between London and Congo. The point is that the white people treat the black people just as bad as the Romans treated them. Which is a bit of a paradox. .ube5e60f38edf6343019da109d262cd4c , .ube5e60f38edf6343019da109d262cd4c .postImageUrl , .ube5e60f38edf6343019da109d262cd4c .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ube5e60f38edf6343019da109d262cd4c , .ube5e60f38edf6343019da109d262cd4c:hover , .ube5e60f38edf6343019da109d262cd4c:visited , .ube5e60f38edf6343019da109d262cd4c:active { border:0!important; } .ube5e60f38edf6343019da109d262cd4c .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ube5e60f38edf6343019da109d262cd4c { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ube5e60f38edf6343019da109d262cd4c:active , .ube5e60f38edf6343019da109d262cd4c:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ube5e60f38edf6343019da109d262cd4c .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ube5e60f38edf6343019da109d262cd4c .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ube5e60f38edf6343019da109d262cd4c .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ube5e60f38edf6343019da109d262cd4c .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ube5e60f38edf6343019da109d262cd4c:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ube5e60f38edf6343019da109d262cd4c .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ube5e60f38edf6343019da109d262cd4c .ube5e60f38edf6343019da109d262cd4c-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ube5e60f38edf6343019da109d262cd4c:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: The Great Gatsby, Fitzgerald EssaySo what is Conrad trying to say about the title Heart of Darkness? Is he trying to make a point how horrible the colonisation really where for everyone, not just the natives. Or is he trying to show how the dark people literally were pushed down by the white people, wanting to make it even clearer that they hadnt done anything wrong and showing how helpless they were? Maybe his point is to show us the darkness in the white peoples heart? Conrad is perhaps talking about the geographical darkness? That the jungle is one of the darkest place, for instance that the river is one of the darkest places in the book. Because the river is the reason why the black people are there, without the river they wouldnt have anything to do- no river-no trading.